Search

Enhancing Student Understanding Through Strategic Assessment Techniques

In my second year of teaching, I encountered a revelation that was both surprising and eye-opening: despite the numerous quizzes, tests, projects, and presentations I assigned, I couldn't conclusively determine whether my students were genuinely learning. The points they accumulated, which translated into final grades, seemed to fall short in reflecting their actual learning progress.

This realization was the catalyst for a significant shift in my teaching methods, prompting me to reassess and overhaul my assessment and grading strategies. Initially, the idea of transitioning to a standards-based grading system seemed intimidating, but my personal experiences and research on its positive impact on student motivation and mental health swayed me towards its potential, even amidst the mixed evidence on its effects on learning outcomes. Furthermore, I discovered that minor tweaks in assessment design could offer clearer insights into students' mastery and areas needing further development.


Designing Meaningful Multiple-Choice Questions

While multiple-choice questions often face criticism in educational assessments, they can be incredibly valuable for learning when carefully designed, particularly for formative assessment and practice. The secret lies in the creation of the incorrect options.


In the beginning, I believed that crafting multiple-choice questions involved a stem, a correct answer, and plausible incorrect answers. I would create quizzes with 10 questions and provide students with their scores, under the impression that this would give them actionable feedback. However, I later recognized the flaws in this approach.


Now, I concentrate on developing one or two questions, with each incorrect option meticulously crafted to reveal a common misconception. These questions are more challenging to create individually, but by reducing the quantity, I maintain a similar workload while gaining more insightful feedback.


Here's an illustrative example:


Identify the punctuation error in the following sentence and select the option that corrects it: "My brother and I left our lunches and bags on the bus so we left school and walked to the bus garage to get our food."

A. My brother, and I left our lunches and bags on the bus so we left school and walked to the bus garage to get our food.

B. My brother and I left our lunches, and bags on the bus so we left school and walked to the bus garage to get our food.

C. My brother and I left our lunches and bags on the bus, so we left school and walked to the bus garage to get our food.

D. My brother and I left our lunches and bags on the bus so we left school, and walked to the bus garage to get our food.

Each incorrect option highlights a different misunderstanding: Option A points to confusion about compound subjects, B to compound objects, and D to compound verbs and phrases.


The strategy is to anticipate common student misconceptions and design incorrect answers that expose these areas of confusion. The number of options may vary, but the goal is to create as many incorrect answers as necessary to address potential misunderstandings.


Students can use this feedback to determine their next learning steps. I provide a document with links to instructional videos targeting these misconceptions, allowing students to immediately engage with the material they need to master.


Creating Assessment Blueprints

How does this strategy extend to a comprehensive test? Assessment blueprints act as a guide to the learning objectives targeted by each question. These are especially useful for assessments linked to a curriculum, as they enable me to identify the focus of each question intentionally. Here are three examples of what these assessment blueprints might look like.

This approach doesn't change the assessment itself but creates opportunities to use the results to facilitate further learning by showing students how the questions relate to the concepts they've been studying.


For instance, if questions 1, 3, and 5 all relate to the same concept, a student who struggles with these questions can pinpoint the area for concentrated effort. After analyzing the results, students can identify the specific concept or two they need to work on, and I can offer resources and activities, sometimes forming small groups to focus on particular concepts to reengage students in the learning process.


My aim was to ensure that students grappling